Some findings

Im using 3 browsers, Opera, FireFox and IE6 to test my site, a normal routine, and I found that:

• Opera Smartest and fastest browser, although weak security support in early versions, but using the latest version 8.50, you can do things like online banking without trouble.
• Firefox A browser that is build 'strict' and doing things in 'strict' mode. I'm not saying this is bad, but sometimes it shows that the browser is somehow dumb, but still a lot better than IE in many ways. One thing I dislike about FireFox is how it handles the cache, clicking a "Back" button and your previous data in a form is lost and you need to retype EVERYTHING.
• IE6 Im using IE 6, haven't test out the latest IE 7, nothing much to say about it. Any human being who knows how a computer looks like, they surely seen IE in action or at least used it once. Good thing about IE ? they're everywhere...

No chance to use a Netscape browser, not really not having the chance, just that I'm lazy to download and install a 4th browser in my computer. Netscape Communicator was my first choice back in the old days until Opera is born.

Protecting your email adress ? Why ?

Posting your email address on a website is a sure-fire way to get an Inbox full of unsolicited email advertisements. In short, these sites are a spammer's paradise. "Professional" spammers uses spambot to get the job done.

Spambots are small spider programs let loose on the Internet by spammers to harvest email addresses on the web pages like newsgroup postings, discussion boards, guestbooks, special-interest group (SIG) postings, and chat-room conversations etc. They do not obey the robots.txt rule and request webpages like a beggar who has not eaten for months, there by exhausting megabytes of bandwidth of your web server within minutes. Their intention is to just get all email addresses, if found, on the webpages. Spambots can disguise themselves in many ways. Since they are programmed by the humans (SPAMMERs), they come in different flavors. It is very hard to keep track all of them. But we can prevent them harvesting emails by installing some scripts on the server.

There are a number of methods web site developers are currently employing in attempt to disguise email address links from email harvesting spam bots. These include techniques such as replacing characters in the address with numeric entities, writing the addresses with JavaScript, and writing addresses in plain English. Because many of these are coded directly into a web page using HTML and related technologies, they each depend on the inability of user-agents to properly 'decode' the links.

There seems to be a lot of blind-faith in using these methods, and assumptions that email harvesting bots will not be designed to distinguish anything but a simple mailto:user@example.com style link. Perhaps there is not currently a need to design smarter bots since the majority of web sites do not employ any methods for hiding email addresses. Many modern programming languages include the tools to develop a simple user-agent that could be used to collect email addresses in a matter of hours. A simple bot just needs to make an HTTP request for a web page, scrape it for email addresses, and then continue to make requests for any URLs linked to the original page.

The manner in which an email bot discovers an email address or email link can be wide-ranging, from a simple match on an email address (user@example.com) or mailto link (mailto:user@example.com) to more advanced rendering of HTML entities and JavaScript to find hidden addresses. I believe that if an email harvesting user-agent were to be built on top of a modern web browsing rendering engine, if this hasn't happened already, it would be capable of discovering just about any email address no matter how it is hidden.

source: http://mikebrittain.com/research/spambots/